ideas, restates thesis, or provides joe meng uiuc thesis statement statement of what this means. Wrote notes which included irrelevant facts which did not answer the research questions. Selected mostly effective keywords to use in researching the questions. Follow us on, facebook. Extracted a lot of information which wasnt relevant. Organization and Synthesis 3 points 2 points 1 point 0 points 3 Presented content clearly and concisely with a logical progression of ideas and effective supporting evidence. Wrote notes including succinct key facts which directly answered all of the research questions and were written in the student's own words. Created citations which were incomplete or inaccurate, and provided no way to check the validity of the information gathered. Incomplete, points, research Questions 3 points 2 points 1 point 0 points 3, wrote thoughtful, creative, well-worded specific questions that were relevant to the assigned topic. Selected no effective keywords to use in researching the questions. Wrote questions which lacked a specific focus, were poorly stated, and not relevant to the assigned topic.
Grading rubric foesearch paperany discipline Senior Project Research Paper Rubric - Rosemont High School Scoring Rubric for Oral Presentations: Example #1
Research Process Rubric - UW-Stout
Why oregon law school essay
Middle school crush essay
Research paper organizational development
Effectiveness of online advertising research paper
Selected an appropriate and effective format to creatively communicate research findings. Identified no appropriate sources in any format. Cited most sources of information improperly and provided little or no supporting documentation to check accuracy. Wrote notes which included facts that answered most of the research questions and were written in the students own words. Presented content which failed to maintain a consistent focus, showed minimal organization and effort, and lacked an adequate amount of supporting evidence. Wrote well-worded, specific questions that were relevant to the assigned topic. Extracted mostly relevant information. Brainstormed keywords, categories, related terms that were effective in researching the questions. Selected some keywords that were not effective in researching the questions. Wrote questions which lacked focus, were poorly stated, and were not entirely relevant to the assigned topic. Some notes were copied directly from the original source. Used information ethically all of the time.